389
Fashion Jobs
CHANEL
Stock & Operation Coordinator
Permanent · ADMIRALTY
BOBBI BROWN COSMETICS
Senior Education Manager, Bobbi Brown, Apac
Permanent · HONG KONG
TOM FORD
Marketing Director, Tom Ford Beauty
Permanent · HONG KONG
ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES
Assistant Demand Planning Manager
Permanent · HONG KONG
ESTÉE LAUDER - BRAND
Retail Marketing Manager, Estée Lauder
Permanent · HONG KONG
CLINIQUE
Senior Marketing Manager, Clinique
Permanent · HONG KONG
LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER
Repair Operations Specialist
Permanent · HONG KONG
LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER
Specialist - Client Development
Permanent · HONG KONG
LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER
Senior Specialist - Client Development
Permanent · HONG KONG
BENEFIT COSMETICS
Retail & Operations Manager
Permanent · HONG KONG
CHRISTIAN DIOR COUTURE
Logistics Officer - Sales Administration
Permanent · CAUSEWAY BAY
LORO PIANA
Client Development Manager
Permanent · HONG KONG
BOBBI BROWN COSMETICS
Senior Education Manager, Bobbi Brown, Apac
Permanent · HONG KONG
CHANEL
Business Systems Manager – Learning/Collaboration/Talent
Permanent · TAIKOO SHING
CHANEL
Assistant Payroll Manager - HR Business Services, Asia Pacific
Permanent · TAIKOO SHING
CHANEL
Senior Client Engagement Executive
Permanent · TAIKOO SHING
CHANEL
Senior Manager, People Sustainability Reporting
Permanent · TAIKOO SHING
CHANEL
IT Asset Manager, Asia Pacific
Permanent · TAIKOO SHING
CHANEL
Head of Governance & Operations, Asia Pacific
Permanent · TAIKOO SHING
CHANEL
Merchandising Manager
Permanent · TAIKOO SHING
CHANEL
Head of Learning Ecosystem And Retail Learning & Development, Asia Pacific
Permanent · TAIKOO SHING
CHANEL
Sustainability Manager (Sustainable Built Environment), Asia Pacific
Permanent · TAIKOO SHING
By
Reuters
Published
Aug 15, 2017
Reading time
2 minutes
Download
Download the article
Print
Text size

Costco owes Tiffany $19.4 million for fake Tiffany rings: U.S. judge

By
Reuters
Published
Aug 15, 2017

A federal judge on Monday said Tiffany & Co may recover at least $19.4 million in damages from Costco Wholesale Corp over the warehouse club chain's illegal sale of counterfeit diamond engagement rings bearing the "Tiffany" name.


archiv


U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain said Tiffany deserves $11.1 million, plus interest, representing triple the lost profit from Costco's trademark infringement, plus the $8.25 million in punitive damages awarded by a jury last October.

The Manhattan judge also permanently barred Costco from selling anything that Tiffany did not make as "Tiffany" products, unless it uses modifiers suggesting that the products have, for example, a Tiffany "setting," "set" or "style."
Costco did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Tiffany had sued Costco on Valentine's Day in 2013.

While the case concerned only about 2,500 rings, Tiffany sued to protect its brand and cachet as one of the world's best-known luxury retailers.

Tiffany last month named industry veteran Alessandro Bogliolo as its new chief executive, to help arrest declines in same-store sales as millennials spend elsewhere on accessories.

Costco had argued that "Tiffany" had become a generic term, excusing its use on a standalone basis.

But the judge found Costco's defenses "not credible," given evidence that displays of fine jewelry were a key part of the Issaquah, Washington-based company's marketing strategy.

Salespeople "described such rings as 'Tiffany' rings in response to customer inquiries, and were not perturbed when customers who then realized that the rings were not actually manufactured by Tiffany expressed anger or upset," Swain wrote.

Meanwhile, Costco's upper management "displayed at best a cavalier attitude toward Costco's use of the Tiffany name in conjunction with ring sales and marketing," the judge added.

The jury had awarded Tiffany $5.5 million rather than $3.7 million for lost profit. Swain found the lower sum sufficient.
Leigh Harlan, Tiffany's general counsel, in a statement said the decision "sends a clear and powerful message" to anyone seeking to infringe the New York-based company's trademark.

"We brought this case because we felt a responsibility to protect the value of our customers' purchases and to ensure that Costco's customers were not misled," she said.

The case is Tiffany and Co et al v. Costco Wholesale Corp, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 13-01041.

© Thomson Reuters 2024 All rights reserved.